Hiring the services of private tutors for your son or daughter will definitely benefit them in the long run. Studies have shown that students who go for private tuition exhibit a better performance at school. This is because this one to one teaching mode is perfectly fine tuned to the understanding of the students. Moreover, there are pupils who find learning difficult in bigger groups in a classroom setting. Such private cases can help them learn better with individual attention. Moreover, for academically advanced students, such classes have enough scope to explore beyond the set syllabus which generate interest for the subject and motivate them to it. To achieve these goals the teacher too has to be efficient at the art of teaching. Here are some guidelines for tutors to deliver lessons to the pupils in an effective manner.
First and foremost learn the art of motivating the child. To this closely study the child?s strengths and preferences. Try to find out if the child is getting enough scope to use them. Also see if there are confidence and self assurance in the pupil. Even if he is interested and has certain talents in sports, music or drama, encourage him participate in those. This will bring the confidence in him which will help him to pay attention to academic tasks too.
Don?t punish a pupil for poor grades. This will diminish the confidence and usher fear towards the subject. Keep high but reasonable expectations. Try to know his problems. For instance, if he does not do his homework, find out if they are too difficult for him; or if he is having problem about getting started. Help him out. The main hurdles to success are depression, family problems, negative peer influence, or a learning disability. Try to figure out if the pupil has any of the above. If so, take the required action.
Make the homework environment appealing to him. You can do so by helping him to have a clean and organized work space with pencils, erasers, paper and other materials. Encourage him to work as independently, as possible. But be there to help if needed.
Try to make study time interesting and packed with fun. Devise Games like word searches, to help study words and meanings. You can think of other unique games that will both teach the subject and remove boredom of learning.
Always praise and reward the pupil for small achievements. Don?t scold for goof ups. Ask him about how to fix the mistake. This will make him realize that there is no fear of failure. Read to him for pleasure. This will boost the skills of reading, writing, spelling and speaking and will also improve general knowledge.
Help him to connect between school and everyday life and also career goals. You can relate the day to day estimate of groceries and gas mileage to calculations he is learning in Math. This will make him understand the significance of Math. Talk to him about the elections and connect it to civics and social studies. As a tutor, you can talk about several interesting things about day to day life and associate them to studies. This will help him take the academic responsibilities more easily. To be a good tutor maintain a positive attitude and a sense of humor.
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Analysis of a classroom interaction
Within the field of education and language teaching over the last few years a distinct shift has taken place, resulting in many classroom interactions placing less emphasis on teachers and teaching and greater emphasis on learners and learning styles. This ‘learner-centred’ approach to education and ESL programs can be seen in many schools and language centres – indeed it is central to the approach taken at the school in question which will be used as the basis of the following classroom interaction study.
The school at which I currently teach has a large and successful language program running as part of an ‘International House’ attached to the main school. The International House supports upwards of sixty NESB students who are predominantly from East Asian countries such as China, Japan and Taiwan. The students arrive in Australia and are placed by the program directors into tiered ESL study classes. These classes accommodate beginner, intermediate and advanced/transition students – (transition students are preparing for admission into mainstream schooling and full immersion in the mainstream program.) A basic premise of the International School ESL program is that students must engage in meaningful activities, work in small classes and groups, take an active role in the learning process and feel they are part of a learning ‘community’.
When the students reach a level of communicative competency deemed by their ESL teachers and International House program consultants to be adequate, they are immersed in mainstream classes in the school according to their age. The following classroom interaction study aims to reflect on several performance standards and areas of interest – including what instructions are given to teachers, what aspect of language is expected to be learned in the lesson, what type of teaching resources and materials are used, what kind of learning is expected of the learners, and what teacher and learner roles are fostered in the classroom.
The school at which I currently teach has a large and successful language program running as part of an ‘International House’ attached to the main school. The International House supports upwards of sixty NESB students who are predominantly from East Asian countries such as China, Japan and Taiwan. The students arrive in Australia and are placed by the program directors into tiered ESL study classes. These classes accommodate beginner, intermediate and advanced/transition students – (transition students are preparing for admission into mainstream schooling and full immersion in the mainstream program.) A basic premise of the International School ESL program is that students must engage in meaningful activities, work in small classes and groups, take an active role in the learning process and feel they are part of a learning ‘community’.
When the students reach a level of communicative competency deemed by their ESL teachers and International House program consultants to be adequate, they are immersed in mainstream classes in the school according to their age. The following classroom interaction study aims to reflect on several performance standards and areas of interest – including what instructions are given to teachers, what aspect of language is expected to be learned in the lesson, what type of teaching resources and materials are used, what kind of learning is expected of the learners, and what teacher and learner roles are fostered in the classroom.
Times Tables – Myths and Reality
I can not even imagine some explanation to justify this immoderate demand. While the results of the times tables up to 9 by 9 are constantly using when we multiply or divide the numbers expressed by several figures, the other operations appear much more rarely in ordinary computations. So why kids must memorize by heart the results of 13 by 16, 19 by 17, etc.? If they have mastered the times tables up to 9 by 9, all such operations may be easily implemented by "pencil and paper". Maybe just this excessive demand provokes the considerable difficulties when teaching the times tables about which we hear so often.
Myth #2. Many kids do not have abilities to master the multiplication tables.
Indeed, at the present the simple multiplication skills of very many pupils are good for nothing, and our children are getting worse and worse at the skills. If the situation is not changed, then, maybe, very soon we will be forced to say that most pupils cannot perform simple multiplication. However, both my experience (35 years in the classroom) and my investigations (23 years of studies) show that every mentally healthy pupil can totally master all basic multiplication facts within the limits of 100.
Of course, there are kids who cannot learn math because they have not been taught to learn properly. Furthermore, there are persons who do not want to learn math at all. They do not try to memorize results, they do not work at lessons, they do not carry out homework themselves, but it is quite other problem. Nevertheless, I would like to lay emphasis once more – if a pupil wants to learn the multiplication tables, then we can help him/her to do this successfully. Good will of children and teachers is the main required condition for success in mastering the multiplication tables.
Myth #3. There are easy ways to learn the basic times-tables in minutes.
Do not trust educators who promise you easy and quick methods of mastering math basics. There are tips which can help to understand how to find the results of some operations, but there is not a magic potion which can help to memorize the results at once. In the past there was not a royal road for learning math as a whole (and the multiplication tables in particular), there is not one at the present, and I cannot imagine that such a road will appear in foreseeable future. To master any skill a pupil must perform certain quantity of exercises. Mastering the multiplication tables requires zealous work, maybe, arduous work. This work must include not only memorizing the results, but permanent application of them in different kinds of computations too. We can make this work interesting and productive, but we can not manage without it. And such a work requires sufficiently plenty of time to reach the desired goal (not minutes and even hours, undoubtedly).
Myth #4. We can manage without mastering simple mental computations because modern mathematics is a science of ideas, not an exercise in calculation. Being a wiz at figures is not the mark of success in mathematics.
I hardly can understand what some educators imply when they speak about New Math or Whole Math keeping in view reform of school mathematics. We can add new topics, shuffle them as playing cards, move them from one grade to another, but we can not manage without numbers when teaching math. Up to the point I have not seen at list one math curriculum which proclaims needlessness of mastering operations with different kinds of numbers, solving equations and so on. Meanwhile my practice and my long-lasting investigations show that pupils with unsteady simple mental computational skills (addition and subtraction within the limits of 20, multiplication and division within the limits of 100) have great difficulties while learning the other basic topics of arithmetic and algebra. Learning mathematics for pupils who have not mastered totally the skills is similar to learning reading without knowing the letters. Without a doubt, being a wiz at figures is not the mark of success in mathematics, but being an ignoramus at figures is the mark of failure in mathematics.
Myth #2. Many kids do not have abilities to master the multiplication tables.
Indeed, at the present the simple multiplication skills of very many pupils are good for nothing, and our children are getting worse and worse at the skills. If the situation is not changed, then, maybe, very soon we will be forced to say that most pupils cannot perform simple multiplication. However, both my experience (35 years in the classroom) and my investigations (23 years of studies) show that every mentally healthy pupil can totally master all basic multiplication facts within the limits of 100.
Of course, there are kids who cannot learn math because they have not been taught to learn properly. Furthermore, there are persons who do not want to learn math at all. They do not try to memorize results, they do not work at lessons, they do not carry out homework themselves, but it is quite other problem. Nevertheless, I would like to lay emphasis once more – if a pupil wants to learn the multiplication tables, then we can help him/her to do this successfully. Good will of children and teachers is the main required condition for success in mastering the multiplication tables.
Myth #3. There are easy ways to learn the basic times-tables in minutes.
Do not trust educators who promise you easy and quick methods of mastering math basics. There are tips which can help to understand how to find the results of some operations, but there is not a magic potion which can help to memorize the results at once. In the past there was not a royal road for learning math as a whole (and the multiplication tables in particular), there is not one at the present, and I cannot imagine that such a road will appear in foreseeable future. To master any skill a pupil must perform certain quantity of exercises. Mastering the multiplication tables requires zealous work, maybe, arduous work. This work must include not only memorizing the results, but permanent application of them in different kinds of computations too. We can make this work interesting and productive, but we can not manage without it. And such a work requires sufficiently plenty of time to reach the desired goal (not minutes and even hours, undoubtedly).
Myth #4. We can manage without mastering simple mental computations because modern mathematics is a science of ideas, not an exercise in calculation. Being a wiz at figures is not the mark of success in mathematics.
I hardly can understand what some educators imply when they speak about New Math or Whole Math keeping in view reform of school mathematics. We can add new topics, shuffle them as playing cards, move them from one grade to another, but we can not manage without numbers when teaching math. Up to the point I have not seen at list one math curriculum which proclaims needlessness of mastering operations with different kinds of numbers, solving equations and so on. Meanwhile my practice and my long-lasting investigations show that pupils with unsteady simple mental computational skills (addition and subtraction within the limits of 20, multiplication and division within the limits of 100) have great difficulties while learning the other basic topics of arithmetic and algebra. Learning mathematics for pupils who have not mastered totally the skills is similar to learning reading without knowing the letters. Without a doubt, being a wiz at figures is not the mark of success in mathematics, but being an ignoramus at figures is the mark of failure in mathematics.
Constructivism Wants YOU
Parents need to know about Constructivism. Coming soon to a school near you. Be afraid.
Teachers need to think about this thing, coming soon to change your professional life, probably for the worse. (Instead of teaching, you’ll be facilitating. You’ll be asking students about their prior knowledge, presumably minimal. Won’t that be fun?)
Constructivism is the unseen sophistry that is oozing into every corner of every classroom. The Education Establishment loves this thing precisely, I think, because it’s murky, hard to understand, and can be used to demand drastic changes in the school system.
Piaget made some little scribbles about how children, when they learn something new, “construct new knowledge” in their heads. A fancy way of stating the obvious. But theorists jumped from that to this: the only valid knowledge is what students construct for themselves, not that useless stuff that teachers used to teach. Wow, that’s a psycho on a white horse jumping the Snake River.
But here’s where we are now. Schools tend to announce, “We’ve adopted a Constructivist approach,” as if that’s a good thing. As if all debate is over.
Schools claim it’s a great way to teach X, Y and Z. That’s the upside, maybe.
The downside for sure is that Constructivism is a great way to make sure LITTLE ELSE gets taught beside X, Y and Z. That’s because Constructivism takes time. Constructivism demands clever theatrical prods that will facilitate children in constructing each bit of new knowledge. Well, there are a lot of bits, about thousands of topics. You’ll need some extra years.
Bottom line: Constructivism promises a lot, teaches a lot less.
Of all the sophistries pushed into the schools, Constructivism may be the champ for pomposity, pretentiousness, and opacity.
I created a short graphic video for YouTube that explains the whole subject in about five minutes. “Constructivism: A Primer for Parents.”
I also have an essay called “34: The Con in Constructivism” on Improve-Education.org. This gives a lot of quotes from the internet that suggest just how crazy Constructivism makes its proponents.
Teachers need to think about this thing, coming soon to change your professional life, probably for the worse. (Instead of teaching, you’ll be facilitating. You’ll be asking students about their prior knowledge, presumably minimal. Won’t that be fun?)
Constructivism is the unseen sophistry that is oozing into every corner of every classroom. The Education Establishment loves this thing precisely, I think, because it’s murky, hard to understand, and can be used to demand drastic changes in the school system.
Piaget made some little scribbles about how children, when they learn something new, “construct new knowledge” in their heads. A fancy way of stating the obvious. But theorists jumped from that to this: the only valid knowledge is what students construct for themselves, not that useless stuff that teachers used to teach. Wow, that’s a psycho on a white horse jumping the Snake River.
But here’s where we are now. Schools tend to announce, “We’ve adopted a Constructivist approach,” as if that’s a good thing. As if all debate is over.
Schools claim it’s a great way to teach X, Y and Z. That’s the upside, maybe.
The downside for sure is that Constructivism is a great way to make sure LITTLE ELSE gets taught beside X, Y and Z. That’s because Constructivism takes time. Constructivism demands clever theatrical prods that will facilitate children in constructing each bit of new knowledge. Well, there are a lot of bits, about thousands of topics. You’ll need some extra years.
Bottom line: Constructivism promises a lot, teaches a lot less.
Of all the sophistries pushed into the schools, Constructivism may be the champ for pomposity, pretentiousness, and opacity.
I created a short graphic video for YouTube that explains the whole subject in about five minutes. “Constructivism: A Primer for Parents.”
I also have an essay called “34: The Con in Constructivism” on Improve-Education.org. This gives a lot of quotes from the internet that suggest just how crazy Constructivism makes its proponents.
Extended School Day and what it could mean for students & parents
There is push in the UK for all schools to offer an extended school day by 2012. This follows evidence from the United States where extending the school day to 10 hours has provided dramatic results. Some underprivileged schools there have managed to increase the percentage of their students going on to college from 10% to 80%. It is hoped that an extended school day will have similarly dramatic results in the UK.
The current school day was created to meet the needs of a different century. We now know that afterschool activity is just as important to student development as what happens during school time. It is often argued that teachers just don’t have enough time to provide the attention that is needed and many students are not getting this input from home. The purpose of the extended school day is to make up for this deficiency. Every country depends on students for its future prosperity so it makes sense to do everything possible to give them the best chance at academic success.
The news of the extended school day has not received universal approval. There has been some concern that this move will increase the pressure felt by students. Some parents complain that their children are already coming home overtired after the eight hour day; what will they be like after a ten hour day? They go on to argue that even if these extra hours are spent doing fun activities it will still not be the same as being at home – school just isn’t as relaxing an environment as your own home. There is also the argument that this approach is patronizing to parents because it is based on the idea that they can’t properly raise their kids.
The extended school day will not mean that students are going to be spending a lot of extra time in the classroom. There are proposals to provide useful clubs and educational resources where students can learn first aid, improve their math skills, or get help with their homework. Some schools may offer a breakfast club where students are sure of a healthy meal. The aim is for schools to work closely with parents and the local community so as to provide the most beneficial activities. This should mean that what is provided will differ from place to place.
The extended school day is part of a wider initiative to extend the services offered by schools. This can involve everything from childcare services to family education. Parents who struggle to find childcare will likely be pleased with the proposals. There is also the possibility that some schools might offer classes where parents and children can learn together. Some schools are already offering some extended services.
Teachers are already overworked in many schools, but the good news is that they won’t be expected to provide all these extra activities. Instead appropriate outside agencies will be invited to provide what is needed. This will also mean that what is available will vary greatly around the country.
The push for the extended school day now seems to be gaining momentum and that all schools will be offering this by 2012. It will likely take a lot longer than this to assess the benefits of this change in school day.
The current school day was created to meet the needs of a different century. We now know that afterschool activity is just as important to student development as what happens during school time. It is often argued that teachers just don’t have enough time to provide the attention that is needed and many students are not getting this input from home. The purpose of the extended school day is to make up for this deficiency. Every country depends on students for its future prosperity so it makes sense to do everything possible to give them the best chance at academic success.
The news of the extended school day has not received universal approval. There has been some concern that this move will increase the pressure felt by students. Some parents complain that their children are already coming home overtired after the eight hour day; what will they be like after a ten hour day? They go on to argue that even if these extra hours are spent doing fun activities it will still not be the same as being at home – school just isn’t as relaxing an environment as your own home. There is also the argument that this approach is patronizing to parents because it is based on the idea that they can’t properly raise their kids.
The extended school day will not mean that students are going to be spending a lot of extra time in the classroom. There are proposals to provide useful clubs and educational resources where students can learn first aid, improve their math skills, or get help with their homework. Some schools may offer a breakfast club where students are sure of a healthy meal. The aim is for schools to work closely with parents and the local community so as to provide the most beneficial activities. This should mean that what is provided will differ from place to place.
The extended school day is part of a wider initiative to extend the services offered by schools. This can involve everything from childcare services to family education. Parents who struggle to find childcare will likely be pleased with the proposals. There is also the possibility that some schools might offer classes where parents and children can learn together. Some schools are already offering some extended services.
Teachers are already overworked in many schools, but the good news is that they won’t be expected to provide all these extra activities. Instead appropriate outside agencies will be invited to provide what is needed. This will also mean that what is available will vary greatly around the country.
The push for the extended school day now seems to be gaining momentum and that all schools will be offering this by 2012. It will likely take a lot longer than this to assess the benefits of this change in school day.
it will take a teacher
As children enter the world today they will rely on what generations of Americans have always relied on to survive – confidence, worth and hope. The ability of people to struggle and persevere is what brought our country through the great depression and two world wars. It is what has enabled Americans to have the courage to invent, discover and create our way to leadership in the world. The world has not stayed the same during the past and it will not stay the same in the future. Information seen as essential to educational standards today will soon be outdated. There will always be a challenge. There will always be a struggle. There will always be change. If we arm our children with the right tools, they will be prepared to face all three.
There will be new ideas, new discoveries and new creative works that will change our future as much as our past has changed. This will not be accomplished by people who have to but want to follow their dreams. As educators, the will to learn is what we must nurture most in our next generation. The passion to seek one’s purpose in life is what we must encourage in our children. The only real standards our children must meet for their future are the ones they set for themselves. It is their expectations and goals that will matter most to them. It is their journey they must walk. It is their dreams that must come true.
To begin to solve the problems in education today we need more than just government programs and taxpayer’s money. Buildings, textbooks, curriculums, educational standards are all fine but most of all we need teachers who know how to connect with students. All the educational theories past, present and future can never replace the impact one human being can have on another in the classroom. It will take more than a sound bite on television or a campaign promise to make our students believe in themselves – it will take a person who believes in them. In life it takes a parent, grandparent, neighbor and friend. In education.
Which Is The Right School 4 Child?
All Parents want to find the right play school for their kids which a tall order to meet. With so many preschool around, you find yourself at crossroads. Then the question arises, Where and How to go from here.
An easy choice would be to go in for an established school which meets your approval and a difficult choice would be to find a school which enables its pupils to look beyond the boundaries and want & also let its pupils personalities to become as unique as their Thumbprints.
The following checklist may come handy:
1. A school with a vision.
2. A school which aims, focuses and provides learning opportunities for an overall growth and development of its pupils while retaining their individual essence.
3. A school which attaches equal importance to curricular and co-curricular activities and balances the two through a well planned programme to be followed through out the year.
4. A school with qualified, experienced and dedicated teaching staff which encourages its pupils to question explore and think for new answers.
5. A school which has the requisite infrastructure to meet the aims and objectives of the school.
6. A school which maintains good student-teacher ratio.
7. A school which is forthcoming in sharing its pupils progress with their parents at regular intervals.
8. A school which has counselling and guidance services / programmes for its students and their parents.
9. A school which instils high self-esteem in its pupils and respect for one's cultural and moral values.
10. A school which dutifully aims for giving responsible, committed and patriotic citizens and leaders of tomorrow.
One may also take into account other features of the school, like it's location , transport facilities offered, hygiene standards observed in matters of health, sanitation and drinking water ,ventilation , natural light & size of the classroom, play ground / play area ,strength of support staff, safety and security measures undertaken.
You make your own checklist according to your expectations and priorities. More over, if possible try meeting the other students, their parents and the teachers of the school of your choice.
All the best parents! We hope you make the right choice.
Times Tables
A short web search only and you will find many utterances like the followings:
“Learning the "multiplication tables" is one of the first traumas that children usually face when learning arithmetic.”
“The dread rite of passage all children face: the multiplication tables.”
“Parents often remark that their children experience difficulty retaining their math’s times tables.”
“On a personal level, as a kid I found learning my multiplication tables terribly hard.”
If the mastering of this simple skill brings appearance of so negative feelings, then, evidently, there is something wrong with school math education. To improve the situation, we should find the causes of the difficulties and try to eliminate them. Even a brief analysis of the state of affairs allows ascertaining the next ten sources of the difficulties.
Cause #1. Pupils begin to learn the times tables while many of them have not mastered simple mental addition and subtraction totally.
Cause #2. Pupils learn the times tables without simultaneous learning the corresponding to them division facts.
Cause #3. To memorize the multiplication facts, many pupils use the learning by rote only, and the knowledge which has been crammed is forgotten very soon.
Cause #4. Criteria of the mastering the multiplication tables are ill-defined. Teachers and parents have no exact method to determine whether a kid has mastered the skills totally or not.
Cause #5. The memorized results of the times tables are not used in ordinary calculations on a regular basis. Because of that they are forgotten gradually.
Cause #6. Some educators suppose that pupils must learn the times tables up to 20 by 20. But some results (16 by 17, 19 by 18, etc.) are too difficult for kids to remember for a long time.
Cause #7. Many pupils have poor memory in view of the fact that the methods of teaching mathematics which are used at school do not encourage the development of their memorizing abilities.
Cause #8. Pupils are allowed to use calculators too early, and, instead of development of their independent computational abilities, their brains get a cripple wheel-chair for moving in the world of numbers.
Cause #9. The math curriculum of the first four grades is overfilled with great number of various topics, and because of that there is no sufficient time for required quantity of exercises.
Cause #10. The worst method of teaching the times tables is used very often – "Just shut up and learn them, or you'll fail!"
Possibly, this list of sources of the difficulties is not full. Maybe some of the causes will seem insignificant or farfetched to readers. So I will try to motivate and detail my considerations in the next articles.
“Learning the "multiplication tables" is one of the first traumas that children usually face when learning arithmetic.”
“The dread rite of passage all children face: the multiplication tables.”
“Parents often remark that their children experience difficulty retaining their math’s times tables.”
“On a personal level, as a kid I found learning my multiplication tables terribly hard.”
If the mastering of this simple skill brings appearance of so negative feelings, then, evidently, there is something wrong with school math education. To improve the situation, we should find the causes of the difficulties and try to eliminate them. Even a brief analysis of the state of affairs allows ascertaining the next ten sources of the difficulties.
Cause #1. Pupils begin to learn the times tables while many of them have not mastered simple mental addition and subtraction totally.
Cause #2. Pupils learn the times tables without simultaneous learning the corresponding to them division facts.
Cause #3. To memorize the multiplication facts, many pupils use the learning by rote only, and the knowledge which has been crammed is forgotten very soon.
Cause #4. Criteria of the mastering the multiplication tables are ill-defined. Teachers and parents have no exact method to determine whether a kid has mastered the skills totally or not.
Cause #5. The memorized results of the times tables are not used in ordinary calculations on a regular basis. Because of that they are forgotten gradually.
Cause #6. Some educators suppose that pupils must learn the times tables up to 20 by 20. But some results (16 by 17, 19 by 18, etc.) are too difficult for kids to remember for a long time.
Cause #7. Many pupils have poor memory in view of the fact that the methods of teaching mathematics which are used at school do not encourage the development of their memorizing abilities.
Cause #8. Pupils are allowed to use calculators too early, and, instead of development of their independent computational abilities, their brains get a cripple wheel-chair for moving in the world of numbers.
Cause #9. The math curriculum of the first four grades is overfilled with great number of various topics, and because of that there is no sufficient time for required quantity of exercises.
Cause #10. The worst method of teaching the times tables is used very often – "Just shut up and learn them, or you'll fail!"
Possibly, this list of sources of the difficulties is not full. Maybe some of the causes will seem insignificant or farfetched to readers. So I will try to motivate and detail my considerations in the next articles.
21st-Century Skills -- this will be a Hot Topic
The Education Establishment wants us to believe that American students are burdened by having too much knowledge, and the solution is to teach them more skills.
Isn’t the premise silly? Many American students can’t find Japan on a map.
Anyway, this battle will be unfolding for years and maybe decades. This battle will probably get tangled up with the debate over so-called National Standards. Here’s something to watch out for: those Standards might be defined as emphasizing skills, and emphasizing skills will turn out to be another way of diminishing content. That’s what the Education Establishment has tended to favor for the last century. (Why these people disdain content and knowledge is an interesting thing to ponder.)
But for now I’m writing only to tell you about two helpful articles:
About a year ago, USA today published an excellent piece about the whole subject of 21st-century skills. You’ll meet Hirsch, Willingham and Kay, three of the big players in this debate. This piece is titled: “What to learn: 'core knowledge' or '21st-century skills'?”
For a shorter article, with less about the present but more historical context, please see my own “21st-Century Skills: Same Old, Lame Old." I try to show that 21st-Century Skills is part of a perennial campaign against teaching or learning foundational knowledge.
Everyone needs to know about this hot topic, and these two articles will certainly do the trick.
(I've been researching this whole subject for several years. I was always finding quotes from Dewey and the others, all making the same point
Isn’t the premise silly? Many American students can’t find Japan on a map.
Anyway, this battle will be unfolding for years and maybe decades. This battle will probably get tangled up with the debate over so-called National Standards. Here’s something to watch out for: those Standards might be defined as emphasizing skills, and emphasizing skills will turn out to be another way of diminishing content. That’s what the Education Establishment has tended to favor for the last century. (Why these people disdain content and knowledge is an interesting thing to ponder.)
But for now I’m writing only to tell you about two helpful articles:
About a year ago, USA today published an excellent piece about the whole subject of 21st-century skills. You’ll meet Hirsch, Willingham and Kay, three of the big players in this debate. This piece is titled: “What to learn: 'core knowledge' or '21st-century skills'?”
For a shorter article, with less about the present but more historical context, please see my own “21st-Century Skills: Same Old, Lame Old." I try to show that 21st-Century Skills is part of a perennial campaign against teaching or learning foundational knowledge.
Everyone needs to know about this hot topic, and these two articles will certainly do the trick.
(I've been researching this whole subject for several years. I was always finding quotes from Dewey and the others, all making the same point
Ten Education Ideas We Might Want To Reconsider
One fascinating thing about education is that everyone has an analysis or a miracle cure.
Even when correct, however, a lot of these theories seem to me superficial. They don’t deal with the deep-down pathologies.
If we’re seeing really bad results, can’t you usually be pretty sure there’s a really bad idea down there somewhere?
Rushing in where angels might fear to tread, I offer my checklist of bad ideas undermining many American schools:
Self-esteem is pushed
Constructivism is injected into every course
Arithmetic is badly taught
Reading instruction is flawed
Guessing is encouraged
Foundational knowledge is slighted
Group learning is favored
Memorization is dismissed
Handwriting is not taught
Fuzziness is praised
Put aside for the moment whether a school is rich or poor, the teachers good or bad, the students smart or not so smart; put aside all the explanations and alibis typically mentioned. Behind all of that, these bad ideas are humming away 24/7, diminishing educational effectiveness.
Presumably for ideological reasons, our Education Establishment is more focused on social engineering than on intellectual engineering. The result is that they tend to favor inferior pedagogical methods. That’s what I believe this list is: inferior pedagogical methods.
Even when correct, however, a lot of these theories seem to me superficial. They don’t deal with the deep-down pathologies.
If we’re seeing really bad results, can’t you usually be pretty sure there’s a really bad idea down there somewhere?
Rushing in where angels might fear to tread, I offer my checklist of bad ideas undermining many American schools:
Self-esteem is pushed
Constructivism is injected into every course
Arithmetic is badly taught
Reading instruction is flawed
Guessing is encouraged
Foundational knowledge is slighted
Group learning is favored
Memorization is dismissed
Handwriting is not taught
Fuzziness is praised
Put aside for the moment whether a school is rich or poor, the teachers good or bad, the students smart or not so smart; put aside all the explanations and alibis typically mentioned. Behind all of that, these bad ideas are humming away 24/7, diminishing educational effectiveness.
Presumably for ideological reasons, our Education Establishment is more focused on social engineering than on intellectual engineering. The result is that they tend to favor inferior pedagogical methods. That’s what I believe this list is: inferior pedagogical methods.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
